FCC Form 477 3 states June 2020 data

Hawk Networks

Data updated June 2026

Hawk Networks filed with the FCC across 3 states and territories; every figure below is standardized against 2,138 other filers' state footprints using the same field definitions, so its geographic reach reads in context, not isolation.

State reach, in one line

Hawk Networks opens on geographic reach: #108 of 2,138 filers by states with filings (3 states), with 102 records behind that footprint. Hawk Networks reports regional broadband footprint: 102 Form 477 deployment records across 3 states and territories.

102
deployment records reported to the FCC
#1,794 of 2,138
corpus placement by total records
3
states and territories with filings
#68 of 82 providers reporting in Oregon
rank among providers in Oregon alone

Form 477 records count census blocks a provider reports it can serve, not subscribers or homes connected, a measure of reported reach.

Record scope. Counts are Form 477 records flagged as offered to consumers; at least 90% of this provider's filings are. How the count is scoped.

Hawk Networks state-reach reading

Hawk Networks sits in the lower third of Form 477 providers by record volume (< 329). Thin filing books still matter when they dominate one state or a niche technology pocket rather than a national residential footprint.

Oregon alone accounts for 88.2% of Hawk Networks's filings (90 of 102), a concentrated book where one state can swing the national picture. Form 477 historically let providers mark a whole census block from a single reachable address; treat these counts as declared capability, not address-level availability, speed, or price.

Filing desk

Filer FCC477-HAWK-NETWORKS · Hawk Networks 102 records · 3 states

102 · RANK-LOWER · FOOT-REGION

  • BOOK-MICRO 102
  • RANK-LOWER #1,794
  • FOOT-REGION 3 states
  • IN-ST-MID #68 in Oregon
  • PHOTO-FINISH ≈ Onslow Cooperative Te…
  • MED-BELOW Below median
  • COV-BROAD #108 by states

Nearest record peer: Onslow Cooperative Telephone Association (+ 0 records)

Instrument codes from this filer’s Form 477 deployment records, corpus rank, geographic footprint, in-state rank, photo-finish peer, median ratio, and separate state-count rank, not a service-quality score.

Record neighbourhood

Nationwide filing poles and nearest ABS record peers, not a reprint of every state table row.

Hawk Networks among its record-volume peers

Filing volume alone does not predict state reach: Hawk Networks and its 6 nearest record-volume peers each cover a different number of states.

Hawk Networks vs. its 6 nearest record-volume peers

Deployment records filed vs States/territories covered 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 7 entities by Deployment records filed (X) and States/territories covered (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Scale and reachBroad but thinConcentrated filerBelow peer median both 100.5101101.5102102.5103103.5 0.511.522.533.5 Deployment records filed States/territories covered Hawk NetworksOnslow Cooperative Telephone AssociationEBTX Wireless, LLCIntellipopWarm Springs Telecommunications CompanyVS EnterprisesGila Broadband LLC

A crawlable text summary: Hawk Networks filed 102 records across 3 states, against a peer-group median of 102 records and 1 states.

Providers near Hawk Networks on state reach

Peer filers for Hawk Networks by state/territory reach in the second panel; the first panel still shows nearest record-volume neighbours (record floor ≥1,000, state floor ≥2).

Similar state/territory reach

Nearest filers by states with filings (3 here), excluding the record-volume set.

Speed-tier climate where Hawk Networks files

Record-weighted across the 3 states where Hawk Networks files, those states' Form 477 maxaddown mix is 26.5% in the 100 Mbps+ tiers, within 3 pp of the national 24.6% mix. The footprint climate tracks the country average; it still is not Hawk Networks's own speed claim.

Federal broadband speed-tier distribution Horizontal bar showing the share of 102 FCC Form 477 deployment filings across the five federal speed-threshold bands. 26.5% <3/0.768 12.7% 3/0.768 → 25/3 34.3% 25/3 → 100/20 24.5% 100/20 → 1G Sub-broadband 27 Legacy 13 Standard 35 Giga-capable 25 Gigabit+ 2 102 filings · 5 federal speed-threshold bands
Record-weighted Form 477 maxaddown mix across 3 footprint states (state climates, not Hawk Networks retail speeds)

Source: FCC Form 477 fixed broadband deployment data, June 2020 status (final Form 477 release) · Derivation: record-weighted join of state_speed_tiers to this filer's provider_states weights (state climates, not retail speeds) · National tier finder →

How Hawk Networks Ranks Nationally

Providers by reported footprint size, Hawk Networks highlighted

102 records · #1,794 of 2,138

Hawk Networks sits at roughly the 16th percentile by filing volume among 2,138 FCC Form 477 filers, roughly 7.7x smaller than the median provider's 781 records.

Coverage Footprint

Hawk Networks - reported deployment records by state (FCC Form 477)
AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
UT
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
NV
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
TX
FL
Scale: 4–21 21–38 38–56 56–73 73–90
View all 3 states as a list
  1. Oregon: 90
  2. North Carolina: 8
  3. Washington: 4

Where Hawk Networks Reports the Most

Hawk Networks - top states by reported deployment records

Oregon leads · 90 records

1. Oregon: 901. Oregon902. North Carolina: 82. North Carolina83. Washington: 43. Washington4
How Hawk Networks's 102 filed records break down by state Same rows as the table below
  • Oregon 90
  • North Carolina 8
  • Washington 4

Full State Breakdown

State Records
Oregon 90
North Carolina 8
Washington 4

Disclaimer: Data from FCC Form 477. For informational purposes only. Coverage data represents provider filings, not guaranteed service at a specific address. Always verify availability directly with the provider.

Source: FCC Form 477 fixed broadband deployment dataset, June 2020 status (final Form 477 release) · Derivation: provider totals and state ranks computed from census-block filing rows; no editor-typed coverage figures

Read with this filer

Onslow Cooperative Telephone Association (102) · EBTX Wireless, LLC (102) · Intellipop (103) · Warm Springs Telecommunications Company (103) · Form 477 reading guide →

What to do with Hawk Networks's footprint

A high record count is filing volume, not a guarantee of service at your address.

Figures are FCC Form 477 fixed-deployment data as of June 2020, the final Form 477 release, self-reported by census block. For current, address-level availability, use the FCC National Broadband Map.