Cox Communications, Inc.
Data updated June 2026
Where Cox Communications, Inc. reports it can deliver broadband, its full Form 477 footprint, the states it covers, and how its reported reach compares nationwide.
The footprint, in one line
Cox Communications, Inc. reports multi-region broadband footprint - 314,097 Form 477 deployment records across 19 states and territories.
- 314,097
- deployment records reported to the FCC
- #13 of 2,141
- national rank by total records
- 19
- states and territories with filings
- #6 of 73 providers reporting in Arizona
- rank among providers in Arizona alone
Form 477 records count census blocks a provider reports it can serve, not subscribers or homes connected, a measure of reported reach.
What the FCC Data Tells Us About Cox Communications, Inc.
Cox Communications, Inc. appears in the FCC Form 477 broadband deployment dataset with 314,097 individual filings spread across 19 states and territories. That volume of filings points to a multi-region operator, each record represents a distinct census-block-and-technology combination the provider has reported serving, so the raw count reflects both geographic reach and the number of technology tiers the company deploys (for example, fiber and DSL in the same block count as two records).
By total records filed, Cox Communications, Inc. ranks #13 of 2,141 providers nationally. That is roughly 402x the median provider's 781 records, the FCC's midpoint value across all 2,141 reporting providers in this dataset. Put another way, Cox Communications, Inc. sits at the top 1% by filing volume among every provider in the Form 477 dataset.
How we calculate this rank
We sort every provider with a Form 477 filing (2,141 in total) by total records, from highest to lowest. Cox Communications, Inc.'s position in that sorted list is its rank (#13). The median is the midpoint value of that same sorted list, and the "roughly 402x the median provider's 781 records" comparison is simply Cox Communications, Inc.'s record count divided by (or compared against) that midpoint.
The national rank above lines Cox Communications, Inc. up against every provider in the dataset, from single-block filers to nationwide carriers, which can bury a strong regional player. A narrower, arguably more useful cut: within Arizona specifically, Cox Communications, Inc. ranks #6 of 73 providers reporting in Arizona by records filed there. We rank every provider that reports at least one record in Arizona against every other provider reporting in that same state, so the comparison is apples-to-apples with local competitors rather than the entire nationwide field.
Arizona is the largest single market for Cox Communications, Inc. with 61,164 deployment records on file, followed by Louisiana at 36,404 records. Averaged across its footprint, the provider files roughly 16,531 records per state, a useful yardstick for comparing how deeply it has penetrated each territory versus competitors listed on the same state pages.
Keep in mind Form 477 counts filings, not subscribers or homes passed. A high record count means the provider has told the FCC it is capable of serving many census blocks; it does not guarantee active service at any specific street address, nor does it reflect actual subscriber numbers. Use this page alongside the state breakdown below to see where Cox Communications, Inc.'s reported footprint is densest, and cross-reference with the technology mix on each state page to understand what speeds and delivery methods are on file for each market.
How Cox Communications, Inc. Ranks Nationally
Where Cox Communications, Inc.'s 314,097 records sit among all 2,141 providers' reported footprints, grouped by order of magnitude (footprint spans from 1 record to over 11 million, so a linear scale would be unreadable).
Providers by reported footprint size, Cox Communications, Inc. highlighted
FCC Form 477 fixed broadband deployment data (June 2020 status)
Coverage Footprint
Where Cox Communications, Inc. reports broadband availability, darker states carry more Form 477 deployment records. Tap a state for its full provider list and technology mix.
Where Cox Communications, Inc. Reports the Most
The 12 states carrying the largest share of Cox Communications, Inc.'s Form 477 deployment records. Arizona leads with 61,164 records, ahead of Louisiana.
Cox Communications, Inc. - top states by reported deployment records
FCC Form 477 fixed broadband deployment data (June 2020 status)
Full State Breakdown
Every state and territory where Cox Communications, Inc. reports broadband availability, tap any state for its full provider list and technology mix.
| State | Records |
|---|---|
| Arizona | 61,164 |
| Louisiana | 36,404 |
| Virginia | 34,409 |
| Oklahoma | 31,016 |
| California | 30,003 |
| Kansas | 29,146 |
| Rhode Island | 18,625 |
| Nevada | 17,501 |
| Florida | 14,211 |
| Arkansas | 12,979 |
| Nebraska | 12,536 |
| Connecticut | 6,117 |
| Georgia | 5,529 |
| Ohio | 2,114 |
| Iowa | 1,457 |
| Idaho | 750 |
| Massachusetts | 102 |
| North Carolina | 26 |
| District of Columbia | 8 |
About This Data
Provider data comes from the FCC Form 477 broadband deployment dataset. Records represent individual broadband availability filings, not subscriber counts. A provider may file multiple records per census block covering different technologies and speeds. Learn more on our methodology page.
Disclaimer: Data from FCC Form 477. For informational purposes only. Coverage data represents provider filings, not guaranteed service at a specific address. Always verify availability directly with the provider.
Related Guides
Related
This reflects the provider's Form 477 filing, not a real-time or address-level availability check. Confirm current availability and pricing with the provider directly.
PlainBroadband is rendered directly from the FCC Form 477 fixed broadband deployment dataset (June 2020 status, the final Form 477 release), no number is typed in by an editor. This provider's coverage figures are computed directly from the underlying FCC Form 477 census-block records, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of June 2020.